Print the page
Increase font size
Armageddon in China

Posted July 28, 2022

Matt Insley

By Matt Insley

Armageddon in China

The stories are legendary. 

The bigger the crisis… the higher the stakes… the more profit there is to be made… 

Nathan Mayer Rothschild’s investment play on the battle of Waterloo has been called one of the greatest trades in history. Piling massive gold holdings into British government bonds after Napoleon's loss helped build a financial empire. 

At the time, writers told a vivid story of Nathan witnessing the victory firsthand and racing couriers to London before other investors could act. 

The truth may be less exciting. Records show the news had already reached London. He just made a smart bet based on the outcome. 

Easier said than done. 

After generations of relative peace, we’ve become complacent. A war raging in Europe is a wake up call. 

We need to position our portfolios for armed conflict.

But the situation in Ukraine is minor compared to what’s worrying corporate executives right now.

A Chinese move on Taiwan has moved near the top of the list of fears. 

Full-scale invasion? Blockade? 

CEOs are weighing the odds, and investors are weighing their options…

Send your opinions to, TheRundownFeedback@StPaulResearch.com

Your Rundown for Thursday, July 28, 2022...

Economic Armageddon for China… and the World

There’s one foundational argument for why China won’t invade Taiwan: It’s not in China’s objective self-interest. It would harm their economy and international reputation, not to mention the inherent practical risks of pulling off such an invasion. 

BUT!

That’s exactly why so many people were skeptical about Russia storming Ukraine.

It’s hard to pin down a percentage likelihood that China will flood the island democracy with foot soldiers. Surely it’s below the 10% chance that many analysts put on a full-scale Russian march toward Kyiv last February. Russian troops had already mobilized, surrounding Ukraine on four sides. 

But the CEO’s making billion-dollar decisions are very worried… 

After all, the odds go from 10% to 100% pretty quickly!

“Multinationals across all sectors are allocating probability scores to different scenarios. In those assessments, an all-out Chinese invasion of Taiwan is still viewed as a marginal risk,” the Financial Times reports.

“However, the potential damage would be enormous if things came to a head. ‘The main lesson from Ukraine is that the west will hit an aggressor with very significant sanctions. Apply what we have seen in Russia to China, and you have Armageddon for the Chinese economy and for the global economy,’” says one executive at a Western tech company. If that does happen, the winners and losers depend on the time horizon…

“If there were full-fledged aggression from China, it would be catastrophic not just for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing but for the global stock market, because it would completely disrupt advanced chip supply,” according to Patrick Chen, a risk analyst in Taipei. “It would also be catastrophic for China because its own chipmakers cannot supply those chips locally.”

But in the long term, it plays into the hands of U.S. chip makers and chip equipment makers. 

Just yesterday, the Senate passed a bill that would provide $52 billion in subsidies for domestic semiconductor firms. 

Our technology expert Ray Blanco highlights “it will be bullish for a lot of semis, especially semiconductor equipment companies… ASML Holdings (ASML)... KLA Corp (KLAC)Applied Materials (AMAT)... Micron Technology (MU)... Texas Instruments (TXN)... the list goes on.

Escalating tensions in the Taiwan Strait only increase the momentum to support companies like these. 

A full-fledged war? That would disrupt the whole industry, and companies operating in the U.S. could be big winners. 

Market Rundown for Thursday, July 28, 2022

The S&P 500 is down 0.50% to 4,000. 

A barrel of West Texas crude is selling for $97.74 per barrel. 

Gold is rallying: up $30 to $1,750 per ounce. 

And Bitcoin is in the green at the time of writing at $22,840.

Send your comments and questions to, TheRundownFeedback@StPaulResearch.com

Check back for more tomorrow; until then, take care! 

For The Rundown,

Matt Insley

Matt Insley
Publisher, The Rundown
TheRundownFeedback@StPaulResearch.com

1991 → 2025: How China Won Resource Dominance

1991 → 2025: How China Won Resource Dominance

Posted October 20, 2025

By Matt Insley

As American policymakers focused on the end of the Cold War, China was already mapping out a “strategic” power play.
Rare Earth Risks

Rare Earth Risks

Posted October 17, 2025

By Matt Insley

Paradigm editors have nailed the rare earth trade. But have we come too far, too fast? Today we dive into this red-hot sector…
Jim Rickards: The Climate Cover-Up

Jim Rickards: The Climate Cover-Up

Posted October 15, 2025

By Matt Insley

We’ve been “propagandized day and night, story after story, about climate change regardless of the topic at hand,” Jim Rickards says.
Censor First. Profit Later.

Censor First. Profit Later.

Posted October 13, 2025

By Matt Insley

During the pandemic, the Biden administration leaned on tech giants to carry out political aims — and the companies complied.
The “Mamdani Effect” Could Be Hochul’s Undoing

The “Mamdani Effect” Could Be Hochul’s Undoing

Posted October 10, 2025

By Matt Insley

The “Mamdani Effect” could be Gov. Kathy Hochul’s undoing in 2026.
Paper Promises Fail, Real Assets Prevail

Paper Promises Fail, Real Assets Prevail

Posted October 08, 2025

By Matt Insley

Buried in an International Monetary Fund (IMF) data release last week was a number that should stop Washington in its tracks.