Print the page
Increase font size
Big Win for Vance

Posted October 02, 2024

Matt Insley

By Matt Insley

Big Win for Vance

Historically, vice presidential debates have had minimal impact on election outcomes.

While memorable moments can occur — such as Lloyd Bentsen dismantling Dan Quayle in 1988 — they rarely sway the final results significantly.

(Quayle’s ticket, for instance, went on to win in a landslide.)

The debate last night between JD Vance and Tim Walz may prove equally inconsequential in determining November's winner.

However…

As potentially the last debate before election day…

It offered both parties a final opportunity to present their views on a national stage.

For his part, Walz showcased the Midwestern appeal that led to his selection as Harris's running mate. 

“He was extra Minnesota nice tonight,” said DNC Chairman Jaime Harrison.

But here’s the kicker, summed up in a New York Times headline: 

“Who Won the Debate? A Crisp Vance Fends Off Walz.”

JD Vance's debate performance stood out with a particularly strong showing that could energize Republicans in the coming weeks.

Send your opinions to, feedback@newsyoucanacton.com

Your Rundown for Wednesday, October 2, 2024...

Vance on the Issues…

At just 40-years old, Vance showcased his policy expertise during the vice presidential debate.

Marked by civility and a focus on issues, the debate allowed Vance to highlight key policy differences between the Republican and Democratic tickets.

On immigration, Vance effectively criticized the Biden administration's border policies, attributing the surge in border crossings to “border czar” Vice President Kamala Harris.

He emphasized the need for stronger border security and highlighted the strain on local communities due to increased immigration.

Regarding abortion, Vance advocated for a states' rights approach, arguing that diverse viewpoints across the country necessitate state-level decision-making.

He also emphasized the importance of pro-family policies, including access to fertility treatments and affordable housing, demonstrating a nuanced understanding of the issue.

Vance went on to acknowledge the complexity of gun violence while proposing practical solutions such as enhanced school security measures.

And he deftly linked the issue of gun violence to border security and mental-health issues.

Furthermore, Vance defended Trump's economic record, spotlighting rising take-home pay and lower inflation during the previous administration.

When challenged on Trump's healthcare plans, Vance assured voters that pre-existing conditions would be covered while emphasizing the need for bipartisan cooperation in developing comprehensive reform.

In short? Vance presented a composed and articulate defense of the Trump campaign's vision for America.

So, how important is this debate in the grand scheme of things? It’s too early for meaningful polling data, keep in mind.

But here’s a related nugget we spotted yesterday:

  • Donald Trump has regained a slight lead over Kamala Harris in Pennsylvania, according to recent polling averages from RealClearPolitics.
  • As of late September, Trump holds 48.1% compared to Harris's 47.9%, marking a shift from mid-September when Harris led by 0.6 points.

Which speaks to the point we’ve been driving home in recent weeks: The competitive race for the 2024 election comes down to the crucial battleground state of Pennsylvania.

Market Rundown for Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2024

S&P 500 futures are down 0.20% to 5,745.

Oil is up almost 3% to $71.87 for a barrel of WTI.

Gold is down 0.75% to $2,669.80 per ounce.

And Bitcoin is down 1.20% to $61,100.

Send your comments and questions to, feedback@newsyoucanacton.com

Rare Earth Risks

Rare Earth Risks

Posted October 17, 2025

By Matt Insley

Paradigm editors have nailed the rare earth trade. But have we come too far, too fast? Today we dive into this red-hot sector…
Jim Rickards: The Climate Cover-Up

Jim Rickards: The Climate Cover-Up

Posted October 15, 2025

By Matt Insley

We’ve been “propagandized day and night, story after story, about climate change regardless of the topic at hand,” Jim Rickards says.
Censor First. Profit Later.

Censor First. Profit Later.

Posted October 13, 2025

By Matt Insley

During the pandemic, the Biden administration leaned on tech giants to carry out political aims — and the companies complied.
The “Mamdani Effect” Could Be Hochul’s Undoing

The “Mamdani Effect” Could Be Hochul’s Undoing

Posted October 10, 2025

By Matt Insley

The “Mamdani Effect” could be Gov. Kathy Hochul’s undoing in 2026.
Paper Promises Fail, Real Assets Prevail

Paper Promises Fail, Real Assets Prevail

Posted October 08, 2025

By Matt Insley

Buried in an International Monetary Fund (IMF) data release last week was a number that should stop Washington in its tracks.
Mamdani Aims to Redefine “Law and Order”

Mamdani Aims to Redefine “Law and Order”

Posted October 06, 2025

By Matt Insley

Today, we’re considering one of the most consequential contests in New York City history: the 2025 mayoral race.