Print the page
Increase font size
Dead End Ahead

Posted July 24, 2026

Matt Insley

By Matt Insley

Dead End Ahead

On Wednesday, we discussed Chevron’s interest in Iraqi oilfields and a possible pipeline route through Syria to the Mediterranean.

The premise is simple: If the Strait of Hormuz is too dangerous, bypass it.

Hours later, the Middle East delivered an ugly reminder. In this war, every detour eventually becomes a target.

Specifically, a tanker sailing through the Red Sea off southern Saudi Arabia was struck by an unknown projectile, igniting a fire.

Yemen’s Houthi rebels later claimed they had attacked two Saudi oil tankers using ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and drones.

Both vessels had loaded refined petroleum products at Yanbu — the Red Sea port Saudi Arabia has increasingly relied on to bypass Hormuz.

They were heading south toward Bab al-Mandeb, the narrow waterway between Yemen and Djibouti.

Source: El Observador

In other words, these ships were already taking the detour.

Here’s how that’s been working: Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline carries oil to Yanbu, allowing cargoes to avoid Hormuz entirely. Tankers leaving Yanbu pass through Bab al-Mandeb before reaching the Indian Ocean.

But now the Houthis are threatening that corridor.

All to say, vulnerabilities abound.

The human cost is becoming impossible to ignore, too. Thousands of sailors remain trapped around the Gulf, while insurers grow increasingly reluctant to cover voyages through the war zone.

So shipping companies are now offering crews enormous bonuses to sail through Hormuz.

It’s one thing when oil traders get nervous. It’s another when sailors start demanding combat pay.

Your Rundown for Friday, July 24, 2026...

Trump Runs Out of Off-Ramps

The White House is reaching the same conclusion as the oil industry: There may be no clean way around this war.

The U.S. is moving special-operations forces, aerial tankers, fighter jets, medics and long-range bombers toward the Middle East. The buildup gives President Trump more options to expand attacks on Iran and potentially strike Houthi forces in Yemen.

Trump would clearly prefer a decisive ending. But Iran and its allies keep widening the battlefield, attacking American troops, energy infrastructure and shipping routes.

That leaves Trump with fewer options, not more.

Jim Rickards saw this coming months ago.

Back in April, while many analysts were still talking about diplomacy, Jim laid out three possible outcomes. Then he dismissed the first two.

“It’s not peace. It’s not negotiation,” he said. “It’s escalation.”

He reasoned every attack on shipping, every strike on energy infrastructure and every Iranian refusal to back down narrowed President Trump’s options. Eventually, the White House would face a choice between accepting a permanent threat to global commerce or expanding the war.

That forecast is proving uncomfortably accurate.

Trump can pull back and risk rewarding Iran’s pressure campaign. He can continue bombing and hope Tehran eventually folds. Or he can escalate in an attempt to restore freedom of navigation and break Iran’s ability to threaten the region.

Escalation may be the only option that produces a result.

Dan Amoss, Jim’s chief analyst, believes the consequences will reach far beyond the battlefield.

“The macro implications of this scenario are: inflation break-evens and swaps through mid-2027 rise... then the U.S. dollar rises with Treasury yields... credit tightens and stocks fall.”

He adds that Fed Chair Kevin Warsh could conclude “crude and diesel are doing the tightening for us at the Fed.”

And if financial conditions deteriorate further?

Dan believes Warsh could pivot toward quantitative easing and even begin hinting that “gold is the new, optimal reserve currency” as the world reassesses the costs of dollar dominance.

That is the chain reaction investors need to watch.

Wednesday’s tanker strike was not simply another attack. It was an attack on one of the oil market’s most important escape routes.

Hormuz is dangerous. Bab al-Mandeb is under threat. And the detours are disappearing.

Market Rundown for Friday, July 24, 2026

S&P 500 futures are up 0.25% to 7,465.

Oil is down 2.80% to $89.60 for a barrel of WTI.

Gold’s up 0.25% to $4,060.40 per ounce.

And Bitcoin’s up 0.30% to $64,950. 

Iraq Is Back

Iraq Is Back

Posted July 22, 2026

By Matt Insley

Chevron's growing investment in Iraq isn’t just about producing more oil. It’s about securing new export routes around one of the world’s most important energy chokepoints.
Newsom's Plan B for Billionaires

Newsom's Plan B for Billionaires

Posted July 20, 2026

By Matt Insley

California voters could approve America’s first statewide wealth tax. We examine Gavin Newsom’s surprising response and why Jim Rickards says investors should pay attention.
Jim Rickards: Slower Inflation Isn’t Lower Inflation

Jim Rickards: Slower Inflation Isn’t Lower Inflation

Posted July 17, 2026

By Matt Insley

Wall Street celebrated a cooler CPI report. Jim Rickards says the most dangerous form of inflation may be the one no government report measures.
Corning’s Second Act

Corning’s Second Act

Posted July 14, 2026

By Matt Insley

Artificial intelligence may dominate the headlines, but one 175-year-old American manufacturer is helping build the infrastructure behind the AI boom.
Lindsey Graham’s Unusual Portfolio

Lindsey Graham’s Unusual Portfolio

Posted July 13, 2026

By Matt Insley

Lindsey Graham wasn’t known for beating the stock market. Instead, he spent a career investing in American power. We explore what his legacy reveals about today's Republican Party.
Jim Rickards: Inflation Is Misunderstood

Jim Rickards: Inflation Is Misunderstood

Posted July 10, 2026

By Matt Insley

Jim Rickards breaks down three drivers of inflation and explains why money velocity matters.