Print the page
Increase font size
Vance Casts Critical Tiebreaker

Posted January 27, 2025

Matt Insley

By Matt Insley

Vance Casts Critical Tiebreaker

We’re closing the loop this morning on a key cabinet confirmation, but we’re currently researching other major stories, including market jitters… China’s AI breakthrough… and tensions between President Trump and “first buddy” Elon Musk. But first…

In a razor-thin vote on Friday, President Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, was confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

The Senate floor was tense as the votes were tallied, resulting in an initial 50-50 split. This after three Republican senators broke ranks with their party to oppose Hegseth’s nomination: Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine and former GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

  • Their dissent, combined with unified Democratic opposition, meant Vice President Vance cast the decisive tie-breaking vote.

This vote marked only the second time in U.S. history that a vice president has been called upon to break a tie for a cabinet nominee, with the first instance being Mike Pence’s tie-breaking vote for Betsy DeVos as Education Secretary in 2017.

The close nature of the vote underscores the controversy surrounding Hegseth's nomination, which was clouded by serious allegations.

Despite these concerns, the Trump administration stood firmly behind Hegseth, with the President expressing confidence in his nominee even as the vote hung in the balance.

The vote further highlights the significance of the vice presidential role in shaping the nation’s leadership…

Your Rundown for Monday, January 27, 2025...

A Closer Look at Constitutional Succession

And while JD Vance played a significant role in getting out the vote for Trump, after Election Day, Vance’s role seemed more muted.

Nevertheless, in the hypothetical scenario where President Trump were to die in office, the Constitutional process for succession would immediately come into play.

According to the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Vice President Vance would automatically assume the role of President.

This transition would be immediate and would not require any additional voting or confirmation process.

As President, Vance would then have the responsibility of nominating a new Vice President.

The process of selecting a new Vice President under these circumstances is outlined in Section 2 of the 25th Amendment — a process which prevents the President from unilaterally appointing a successor.

  • While the President nominates the Vice President in this scenario, the final decision rests with Congress. Both the House and Senate must confirm the nominee by a majority vote.
  • Interestingly, a tie vote could potentially occur in the Senate. If this were to happen, the process would be at an impasse; there is no provision for breaking a tie in this specific situation.
  • The President would then need to nominate a different candidate for Vice President, restarting the confirmation process.

President Vance, therefore, would likely consider a nominee who could gain Congressional approval as well as someone who could effectively support Vance’s administration.

In the interim period before a new Vice President is confirmed, the Speaker of the House would be next in line for the presidency after Vance, followed by the President pro tempore of the Senate.

However, this would only come into play if something were to happen to President Vance before a new Vice President was confirmed.

This constitutional process underlines the critical role that figures like JD Vance play in ensuring the continuity of government leadership and spotlights the importance of having a clear line of succession.

[Reader: Who would you nominate as Vice President if JD Vance suddenly found himself thrust into the presidency? We want to hear your feedback on the most compelling candidates.]

Market Rundown for Monday, Jan. 27, 2025

S&P 500 futures are down 2% to 6,000.

Oil’s down 0.75% to $74.12 for a barrel of WTI.

Gold is down 0.45% to $2,766.40 per ounce.

And Bitcoin’s down almost 4% to $100,845.

All For It, Dead Against It, Deeply Uneasy

All For It, Dead Against It, Deeply Uneasy

Posted March 06, 2026

By Matt Insley

Does the U.S.–Israel strike on Iran put America First… or risk pulling us into another open-ended Middle East war?
MTG vs. AOC

MTG vs. AOC

Posted March 04, 2026

By Matt Insley

Somehow, MTG and AOC have arrived at identical conclusions from opposite directions.
The First 72 Hours: Ayatollah Is Dead

The First 72 Hours: Ayatollah Is Dead

Posted March 02, 2026

By Matt Insley

Here’s the cleanest timeline I can give you, from the first strikes against Iran to the retaliatory counter-strikes that followed…
Jim Rickards: Before You Trust the Odds, Read This

Jim Rickards: Before You Trust the Odds, Read This

Posted February 27, 2026

By Matt Insley

Jim Rickards has been watching the rise of prediction markets closely. Who better to make sense of this brave new world?
AI’s Y2K Moment

AI’s Y2K Moment

Posted February 25, 2026

By Matt Insley

Cast your mind back to 1999. The internet was going to rewire everything. And it would… But first, it gave us Y2K.
State of the Union Preview

State of the Union Preview

Posted February 23, 2026

By Matt Insley

The Supreme Court struck down Trump’s tariffs — but he has a State of the Union address to turn a legal loss into a primetime power move.