Print the page
Increase font size
Vance Casts Critical Tiebreaker

Posted January 27, 2025

Matt Insley

By Matt Insley

Vance Casts Critical Tiebreaker

We’re closing the loop this morning on a key cabinet confirmation, but we’re currently researching other major stories, including market jitters… China’s AI breakthrough… and tensions between President Trump and “first buddy” Elon Musk. But first…

In a razor-thin vote on Friday, President Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, was confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

The Senate floor was tense as the votes were tallied, resulting in an initial 50-50 split. This after three Republican senators broke ranks with their party to oppose Hegseth’s nomination: Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine and former GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

  • Their dissent, combined with unified Democratic opposition, meant Vice President Vance cast the decisive tie-breaking vote.

This vote marked only the second time in U.S. history that a vice president has been called upon to break a tie for a cabinet nominee, with the first instance being Mike Pence’s tie-breaking vote for Betsy DeVos as Education Secretary in 2017.

The close nature of the vote underscores the controversy surrounding Hegseth's nomination, which was clouded by serious allegations.

Despite these concerns, the Trump administration stood firmly behind Hegseth, with the President expressing confidence in his nominee even as the vote hung in the balance.

The vote further highlights the significance of the vice presidential role in shaping the nation’s leadership…

Your Rundown for Monday, January 27, 2025...

A Closer Look at Constitutional Succession

And while JD Vance played a significant role in getting out the vote for Trump, after Election Day, Vance’s role seemed more muted.

Nevertheless, in the hypothetical scenario where President Trump were to die in office, the Constitutional process for succession would immediately come into play.

According to the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, Vice President Vance would automatically assume the role of President.

This transition would be immediate and would not require any additional voting or confirmation process.

As President, Vance would then have the responsibility of nominating a new Vice President.

The process of selecting a new Vice President under these circumstances is outlined in Section 2 of the 25th Amendment — a process which prevents the President from unilaterally appointing a successor.

  • While the President nominates the Vice President in this scenario, the final decision rests with Congress. Both the House and Senate must confirm the nominee by a majority vote.
  • Interestingly, a tie vote could potentially occur in the Senate. If this were to happen, the process would be at an impasse; there is no provision for breaking a tie in this specific situation.
  • The President would then need to nominate a different candidate for Vice President, restarting the confirmation process.

President Vance, therefore, would likely consider a nominee who could gain Congressional approval as well as someone who could effectively support Vance’s administration.

In the interim period before a new Vice President is confirmed, the Speaker of the House would be next in line for the presidency after Vance, followed by the President pro tempore of the Senate.

However, this would only come into play if something were to happen to President Vance before a new Vice President was confirmed.

This constitutional process underlines the critical role that figures like JD Vance play in ensuring the continuity of government leadership and spotlights the importance of having a clear line of succession.

[Reader: Who would you nominate as Vice President if JD Vance suddenly found himself thrust into the presidency? We want to hear your feedback on the most compelling candidates.]

Market Rundown for Monday, Jan. 27, 2025

S&P 500 futures are down 2% to 6,000.

Oil’s down 0.75% to $74.12 for a barrel of WTI.

Gold is down 0.45% to $2,766.40 per ounce.

And Bitcoin’s down almost 4% to $100,845.

Department of War (Crimes)

Department of War (Crimes)

Posted December 05, 2025

By Matt Insley

Within a matter of days, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has found himself enmeshed in two overlapping scandals. Not everyone accepts those scandals at face value…
Americans Are Drowning All Around Us

Americans Are Drowning All Around Us

Posted December 03, 2025

By Matt Insley

When car financing starts to resemble a mortgage, it’s a signal that something larger is breaking. And that something is household income.
Trump Rewrites Ukraine’s Peace Plan

Trump Rewrites Ukraine’s Peace Plan

Posted December 01, 2025

By Matt Insley

Rubio’s envoy takes the lead…
Nvidia’s Uncertain Future

Nvidia’s Uncertain Future

Posted November 26, 2025

By Matt Insley

Nvidia is stuck in the middle of a trade war between the world’s two largest economies. Will Trump allow them to sell into China once more?
Dead Men Can’t Trade

Dead Men Can’t Trade

Posted November 24, 2025

By Matt Insley

Serious talk today…
Aggressively Neutral

Aggressively Neutral

Posted November 21, 2025

By Matt Insley

In a market obsessed with taking sides, sometimes the most radical thing you can do is… nothing.