
Posted March 06, 2026
By Matt Insley
All For It, Dead Against It, Deeply Uneasy
Does the U.S.–Israel strike on Iran put America First… or risk pulling us into another open-ended Middle East war?
That’s the question I asked you on Monday.
Your responses poured in — hundreds of them. Some of you support the strikes without hesitation. Others oppose them outright. A smaller but thoughtful group says it’s simply too early to tell.
When we tallied the responses that clearly took a position, the breakdown looked like this:
- Support: 77.5%
- Oppose:12.4%
- Uncertain:10.1%
What follows is a sample of some thoughtful replies — lightly edited for clarity but largely in your own words.
Your Rundown for Friday, March 6, 2026...
Support, Suspicion and a Warning
Many of you back the strike for one reason: You don’t believe Iran’s leadership could be deterred, negotiated with or “managed” indefinitely.
“Long overdue,” writes Rob K. “Decapitation of Iran’s brutal and bloody leadership… But no boots on the ground, no endless war. I was at CENTCOM during Iraqi Freedom. Nation building is not our military strength.”
Denis M. says: “I support stopping the mullahs from having nuclear weapons. That’s a gamechanger for the future security of the American people.”
Dr. Terry R. argues: “President Trump must have had intel that Iran was planning a surprise attack. Their development of hypersonic missiles and ICBMs was an urgent concern.”
But even the pro-strike camp had a recurring limit: finish fast. Get in, break capabilities and don’t get stuck holding the bag.
The most consistent argument on the opposing side was suspicion — about motive, about influence, about who pays and who bleeds.
“I am disgusted that we are always fighting Israel’s wars,” says Stephen S. “Our young men and women are far too valuable to be in harm’s way, fighting another country’s wars.”
Gordon F. worries about the second-order damage: “Unless Iranian leaders agree to a cease-fire, I see no easy off-ramp. We invoke the international ‘rule of law’… and then violate it whenever our leaders see fit.”
Terri M. feels stung: “I had the sign in the yard. I wore the t-shirt. And now I feel so deceived. ‘Iran is an imminent threat’… Has somebody raided George W. Bush’s old files?”
A lot of these notes carry the same warning: If this expands, it doesn’t just rewrite the Middle East. It rewrites American politics too.
Then there’s the smallest camp — the readers who aren’t picking a team yet, because they’ve watched too many “limited missions” spin out of control.
Richard P., a retired U.S. Navy officer and aviator, writes: “If POTUS can keep this from spreading, keep U.S. troops out of Iran and keep the timeline short, then maybe it will end up as a huge win. But we have an abysmal record.”
Finally, Nathan B. captures a recurring sentiment: “I support the NEED to do something about Iran… I OPPOSE the way in which it was done.”
Market Rundown for Friday, March 6, 2026
S&P 500 futures are down 0.50% to 6,800.
Oil’s up 6.75% to $86.50 for a barrel of WTI.
Gold is up 1% to $5,129.40 per ounce.
And Bitcoin’s down 1.65% to $70k.

MTG vs. AOC
Posted March 04, 2026
By Matt Insley

The First 72 Hours: Ayatollah Is Dead
Posted March 02, 2026
By Matt Insley

Jim Rickards: Before You Trust the Odds, Read This
Posted February 27, 2026
By Matt Insley

AI’s Y2K Moment
Posted February 25, 2026
By Matt Insley

State of the Union Preview
Posted February 23, 2026
By Matt Insley
