In mid-November, President-elect Donald Trump nominated Tulsi Gabbard to be his Director of National Intelligence, a cabinet position which oversees 18 federal intelligence agencies.

As we last noted in August, Gabbard's journey from 2020 Democratic presidential candidate to Trump supporter has been unconventional.

In 2022, for instance, “Tulsi quit the Democratic Party out of disgust,” says Paradigm’s Beltway authority Jim Rickards.

He adds: “She [is] a patriotic American and an Iraqi war veteran who remains active in the U.S. Army Reserve. She’s a former member of Congress” with eight years of experience in D.C.

However, some of her past statements on foreign policy have drawn criticism.

“U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul [R-TX], the House Foreign Affairs chair, called Tulsi Gabbard a ‘baffling’ pick to lead the nation’s Intelligence Community, offering one of the sternest rebukes from a Republican yet,” The Texas Tribune notes.

So, let’s take a look at some of Gabbard’s controversial statements…

Your Rundown for Monday, December 30, 2024...

Harsh on Gabbard, Soft on Hegseth and Patel

For more context, McCaul says: “For someone to have this history of comments that appear to be pro-Putin and pro-Assad, who have historically been our enemies, to head up our intelligence to me is a bit baffling.”

Gabbard’s supposedly baffling comments include…

On the Russia-Ukraine conflict: “This war and suffering could have easily been avoided, if Biden Admin/NATO had simply acknowledged Russia’s legitimate security concerns.”

She’s also openly criticized sanctions against Russia, arguing they hinder diplomatic relations.

On Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad: “Assad is not the enemy of the United States because Syria does not pose a direct threat to the United States.”

Further, Gabbard’s face-to-face meeting with Assad in 2017 has allegedly tarnished her public image. Gabbard, however, defends her willingness to engage with problematic figures… in pursuit of peace.

Which is partly why Trump nominated her to his cabinet in the first place:

I know Tulsi will bring the fearless spirit that has defined her illustrious career to our Intelligence Community, championing our Constitutional Rights, and securing Peace through Strength. [Emphasis ours]

But McCaul’s criticism of Gabbard appears inconsistent when compared to his remarks about Trump’s other controversial cabinet picks — in particular, Pete Hegseth and Kash Patel.

McCaul downplays, for instance, concerns about Hegseth's (ahem) “baggage.” McCaul even predicts Hegseth’s confirmation: “I do think he’s probably going to make it.”

As for Patel, McCaul sympathizes with his plans to overhaul the FBI. (Or, you know, turn it into a D.C. museum.)

Hmm… McCaul seems more willing to overlook controversies surrounding male nominees while harshly judging Gabbard’s qualifications and past statements.

“The Senate, they typically pick and choose, and one of them will have to go down,” McCaul says. “If I were betting, I would say it's probably [Gabbard].”

Here’s the thing: Rep. McCaul won’t participate in Senate confirmation hearings, happening sometime on or after January 3, 2025.

Meanwhile, Senators Cruz and Cornyn (R-TX) both say Gabbard is an “impressive” person. Cruz will approve her nomination. So-called RINO Cornyn is noncommittal.

As the Senate prepares for confirmation hearings, Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination stands at the crossroads of business-as-usual politics and Trump’s — and Gabbard’s — pledge to put America first.